Posted on April 3, 2010 at 10:44 am

TNPG 2010 – 2011 SESSION REVISED LIST OF ELIGIBLE CANDIDATES FOR DIFFERENTLY ABLED CATEGORY FOR PG DEGREE /DIPLOMA / 6Yr M.Ch. (NEURO SURGERY)

What is so special about preparing for an Indian MCQ Medical PG Entrance Exam??

REVISED LIST OF ELIGIBLE CANDIDATES FOR DIFFERENTLY ABLED CATEGORY FOR PG DEGREE /DIPLOMA / 6Yr M.Ch. (NEURO SURGERY) 2010 – 2011 SESSION
COUNSELLING ON 06/04/2010 11:00:00AM
SNO GEN. EENO NAME COM SER/PRI TMARK RANK
1 66283 Dr. THANIGAINATHAN S BC Priv 65.12 588
2 65550 Dr. SHARMILA D BC Priv 63.64 797
3 66295 Dr. SURESH M BC Priv 58.32 1757
4 60255 Dr. JAYALAKSHMI M BC Priv 56.80 2063
5 66074 Dr. AMUDHAN M SC Serv 56.80 2090
6 62367 Dr. RAJ KUMAR J BC Priv 53.64 2821
7 64305 Dr. ANBALAGAN A BC Serv 52.48 3129
8 60845 Dr. PALANIAPPAN V MBC Priv 52.40 3150
9 65025 Dr. VEERAMUTHU K SC Serv 51.76 3322
10 64524 Dr. KAVITHA S BC Priv 51.24 3445
11 61075 Dr. MANJULA C MBC Serv 50.68 3587
12 65678 Dr. MOHANASUNDARAM S BC Priv 48.16 4202
13 68155 Dr. VIJAYAKUMAR E BC Priv 47.92 4254
14 64329 Dr. MUTHU P BC Serv 46.72 4617
15 61964 Dr. PRASANNA K MBC Priv 46.20 4729
16 66280 Dr. NAGARAJAN S BC Priv 45.00 5012
17 67306 Dr. SIVALINGAM P M SCA Serv 44.92 5061
18 66824 Dr. REVATHI R BC Priv 44.64 5106
19 60960 Dr. SUKUMAR R BC Priv 43.92 5285
20 66633 Dr. KALA KRISHNAN BC Priv 43.48 5397
21 65905 Dr. BARATHI S MBC Serv 42.40 5641
22 62172 Dr. KAMALESHWARI K BC Priv 42.24 5656
23 60217 Dr. SOMASUNDARAM M SC Serv 40.96 5945
24 66680 Dr. THANGAVEL A BC Priv 40.68 5969
25 65744 Dr. JEEVA K BC Priv 40.32 6080
26 66299 Dr. SANKAR GANESH T SC Priv 40.28 6091
Page 1 of 1

The Url of this Page is TNPG 2010 – 2011 SESSION REVISED LIST OF ELIGIBLE CANDIDATES FOR DIFFERENTLY ABLED CATEGORY FOR PG DEGREE /DIPLOMA / 6Yr M.Ch. (NEURO SURGERY)

snr

July 23, 2010 at 11:58 pm · Reply

dear sir,
consider my situation:-
1. i got 45.00 marks in tnpg2010 rank 15 under PH category.
2. i have been called for counseling.
3. there they called candidates in two sets
1st. 50 to 70 % of disability
2nd. 40 to 50 % {as adequate candidates not in set
one}
4. my percentage is 50 % and in which set will i
fall?
5. they called me in set 2 and i was unable to get
valuable seat.
6. and i argued that previously it was only 50 to 70 %
who were considered eligible so that i had to come in
the set one.
7. they refused and i dint opt any seat.
8. as there is no clear cut off figure even in the
prospectus and supreme court judgment, i am unclear
about that.
9. so i request your help me decide for at least next
year…