There are a total of 8 Candidates in ST Service. Their Service Community Rank from 1 to 8 are as follows 1877 KARPAGASELVI D ST ServiceCandidate 56.8 3 712 2729 KAVITHA A ST ServiceCandidate 53.36 8 1059 3117 ABIRAMI P ST ServiceCandidate 51.72 13 1197 3280 KAVITHA M ST ServiceCandidate 51.04 14 1254 4633 ANAND […]
TweetUnder the section named "Analysis Opinion" in TargetPG, you will find posts and articles regarding
1. Analysis about Various Court Judgements and their Implications
2. Analysis about Marks / Clusters of Marks / Likely Cut Offs
3. Analysis about Rules and Regulations and their implications in the present scenario
4. Analysis about Recent Modifications and New Regulations and their implications
Community Wise Distribution and Service Status of Candidates
Community Number of Candidates Percent BC 3257 045.7% BCMUSLIM 0224 003.1% MBC/DC 1561 021.9% SC 1552 021.8% ST 0037 000.5% OC 0495 006.9% Total 7126 100.0% Service Particular Number of Candidates Percent Private 4926 69.1% ServiceCandidate 2200 30.9% Total 7126 100.0% Community Number of Private Candidates Number of Service Candidates TOTAL BC 2329 928 3257 […]
TweetTNPG 2009 Mark Distribution of Service Candidates
Total Mark —–Number of Candidates with the Same Mark —–Percentage of the candidates with the same mark13.72 —–0 —–0.0% 18.72 —–0 —–0.0% 19.36 —–0 —–0.0% 20.52 —–0 —–0.0% 21.16 —–1 —–0.0% 21.24 —–0 —–0.0% 21.52 —–0 —–0.0% 21.6 —–0 —–0.0% 21.96 —–0 —–0.0% 22.68 —–0 —–0.0% 22.84 —–0 —–0.0% 22.96 —–0 —–0.0% 23.04 —–0 —–0.0% […]
TweetTNPG 2009 Mark Distribution of Private Candidates
Total Mark —–Number of Candidates with the Same Mark —–Percentage of the candidates with the same mark13.72 —–1 —–0.0% 18.72 —–1 —–0.0% 19.36 —–1 —–0.0% 20.52 —–1 —–0.0% 21.16 —–0 —–0.0% 21.24 —–1 —–0.0% 21.52 —–1 —–0.0% 21.6 —–1 —–0.0% 21.96 —–1 —–0.0% 22.68 —–1 —–0.0% 22.84 —–1 —–0.0% 22.96 —–1 —–0.0% 23.04 —–1 —–0.0% […]
TweetTNPG 2009 Mark Distribution – Both Service Candidates and Private Candidates
Total Mark —–Number of Candidates with the Same Mark —–Percentage of the candidates with the same mark13.72 —–1 —–0.0%18.72 —–1 —–0.0%19.36 —–1 —–0.0%20.52 —–1 —–0.0%21.16 —–1 —–0.0%21.24 —–1 —–0.0%21.52 —–1 —–0.0%21.6 —–1 —–0.0%21.96 —–1 —–0.0%22.68 —–1 —–0.0%22.84 —–1 —–0.0%22.96 —–1 —–0.0%23.04 —–1 —–0.0%23.32 —–1 —–0.0%23.4 —–1 —–0.0%24.4 —–1 —–0.0%24.48 —–4 —–0.1%24.84 —–2 —–0.0%25.12 —–1 —–0.0%25.2 […]
Tweet
Recent Comments