Under the section named "Analysis Opinion" in TargetPG, you will find posts and articles regarding

1. Analysis about Various Court Judgements and their Implications

2. Analysis about Marks / Clusters of Marks / Likely Cut Offs

3. Analysis about Rules and Regulations and their implications in the present scenario

4. Analysis about Recent Modifications and New Regulations and their implications

Sponsored Links 1

Community Service Ranks of ST Candidates

There are a total of 8 Candidates in ST Service. Their Service Community Rank from 1 to 8 are as follows 1877 KARPAGASELVI D ST ServiceCandidate 56.8 3 712 2729 KAVITHA A ST ServiceCandidate 53.36 8 1059 3117 ABIRAMI P ST ServiceCandidate 51.72 13 1197 3280 KAVITHA M ST ServiceCandidate 51.04 14 1254 4633 ANAND […]

Community Wise Distribution and Service Status of Candidates

Community Number of Candidates Percent BC 3257 045.7% BCMUSLIM 0224 003.1% MBC/DC 1561 021.9% SC 1552 021.8% ST 0037 000.5% OC 0495 006.9% Total 7126 100.0% Service Particular Number of Candidates Percent Private 4926 69.1% ServiceCandidate 2200 30.9% Total 7126 100.0% Community Number of Private Candidates Number of Service Candidates TOTAL BC 2329 928 3257 […]

TNPG 2009 Mark Distribution of Service Candidates

Total Mark —–Number of Candidates with the Same Mark —–Percentage of the candidates with the same mark13.72 —–0 —–0.0% 18.72 —–0 —–0.0% 19.36 —–0 —–0.0% 20.52 —–0 —–0.0% 21.16 —–1 —–0.0% 21.24 —–0 —–0.0% 21.52 —–0 —–0.0% 21.6 —–0 —–0.0% 21.96 —–0 —–0.0% 22.68 —–0 —–0.0% 22.84 —–0 —–0.0% 22.96 —–0 —–0.0% 23.04 —–0 —–0.0% […]

TNPG 2009 Mark Distribution of Private Candidates

Total Mark —–Number of Candidates with the Same Mark —–Percentage of the candidates with the same mark13.72 —–1 —–0.0% 18.72 —–1 —–0.0% 19.36 —–1 —–0.0% 20.52 —–1 —–0.0% 21.16 —–0 —–0.0% 21.24 —–1 —–0.0% 21.52 —–1 —–0.0% 21.6 —–1 —–0.0% 21.96 —–1 —–0.0% 22.68 —–1 —–0.0% 22.84 —–1 —–0.0% 22.96 —–1 —–0.0% 23.04 —–1 —–0.0% […]

TNPG 2009 Mark Distribution – Both Service Candidates and Private Candidates

Total Mark —–Number of Candidates with the Same Mark —–Percentage of the candidates with the same mark13.72 —–1 —–0.0%18.72 —–1 —–0.0%19.36 —–1 —–0.0%20.52 —–1 —–0.0%21.16 —–1 —–0.0%21.24 —–1 —–0.0%21.52 —–1 —–0.0%21.6 —–1 —–0.0%21.96 —–1 —–0.0%22.68 —–1 —–0.0%22.84 —–1 —–0.0%22.96 —–1 —–0.0%23.04 —–1 —–0.0%23.32 —–1 —–0.0%23.4 —–1 —–0.0%24.4 —–1 —–0.0%24.48 —–4 —–0.1%24.84 —–2 —–0.0%25.12 —–1 —–0.0%25.2 […]

Sponsored Links 2