• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Preparation Tips MCQ PG
    • Target PG Books and Bruno Books : Medical Books authored by J Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas
      • Target PG Series TNPSC 2nd Edition (16 Papers from 1995 to 2007)
      • Zulfi Raj’s Pre PG Medicine HandBook 4th Edition – Revised by Bruno
      • TargetPG TNPSC Interview Buster Assistant Surgeon Recruitment
      • FirsTest Series – Orthopaedics
      • Tamil Nadu PG Entrance Review – Bruno – PARAS – TargetPG
    • MCQs
  • Exams Calendar
    • Institution Wise
    • Post Graduate ( PG ) Medical Entrance Exam Schedule / Calendar 2013
    • Post Graduate ( PG ) Medical Entrance Exam Schedule / Calendar 2012
  • About Us
    • Feedback, Contact Us, Discuss, Know Related Sites
  • List of All Categories

TargetPG

Target Professional Growth / Post Graduation - a helping hand to the hands that heal

  • Home
  • AIPG
    • AIPPG 2014
    • AIPPG 2012
    • AIPPG 2011
    • AIPPG 2010
      • All India 2010 Allotment
      • All India 2010 Counselling
    • AIPPG 2009
      • All India 2009 Allotment
      • All India 2009 Counselling
    • AIPPG 2008
    • AIPPG 2007
    • AIPPG 2006
    • AIPPG 2005
    • AIPPG 2004
    • AIPPG 2003
  • AIIMS
    • AIIMS 2014 May
    • AIIMS 2013 Nov
    • AIIMS 2012 Nov
    • AIIMS 2012 May
    • AIIMS 2011 Nov
    • AIIMS 2009 Nov
    • AIIMS 2009 May
    • AIIMS 2008 Nov
    • AIIMS 2008 May
    • AIIMS 2007 Nov
    • AIIMS 2006 Nov
    • AIIMS 2006 May
    • AIIMS 2003 Nov
  • TNPG
    • TNPG 2014
    • TNPG 2013
    • TNPG 2012
    • TNPG 2011
    • TNPG 2010
    • TNPG 2009
    • TNPG 2008
    • TNPG 2007
    • TNPG 2006
    • TNPG 2005
    • TNPG 2004
    • TNPG 2003
    • TNPG 2002
  • TN Tamil Nadu
    • 10 A 1 Appointment
    • 10 A 1 Rules
  • TNPSC
    • Special TNPSC 2013
    • Special TNPSC 2009
    • General TNPSC 2009
    • TNPSC 2008 MHO
    • Special TNPSC 2007
    • TNPSC 2007 MHO
    • General TNPSC 2005
    • General TNPSC 2003
    • Departmental Exams
  • UPSC
    • CMS 2010
    • Armed Forces
  • DipNB DNB
    • FMGE
  • CET NEET
  • MBBS
  • MCI
  • Central Institutes
    • PGI Chandigarh
    • SGPGIMS Lucknow
    • JIPMER
    • NIMHANS
    • NIMS Hyderabad
    • SCTIMST Trivandrum
    • CIP Ranchi
    • IMS BHU Varanasi
    • AFMC Pune
    • INHS Aswini
    • IGNOU
    • JNU Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi
  • Private
    • CMC Vellore
    • CMC Ludhiana
    • St.John’s Medical College Bangalore
    • Annamalai University
    • SRMC
    • MANIPAL MAHE
    • COMED-K
    • RGUHS
    • Apollo Medvarsity
    • BR PRIVATE MEDICAL COLLEGE ASSOCIATION, BIHAR
  • Courses
You are here: Home / Courses / Others / Ethical dilemmas.

Ethical dilemmas.

November 9, 2005 by TargetPG Leave a Comment

Ethical dilemmas.
From Journal of Post Graduate Medicine
www.jpgmonline.com

Pandya SK
Department of Neurosurgery, Seth GS Medical College, Parel, Bombay.

Correspondence Address:
Department of Neurosurgery, Seth GS Medical College, Parel, Bombay.

How to cite this article:
Pandya SK. Ethical dilemmas. J Postgrad Med 1997;43:1-3

How to cite this URL:
Pandya SK. Ethical dilemmas. J Postgrad Med [serial online] 1997 [cited 2005 Nov 9];43:1-3. Available from: http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;
year=1997;volume=43;issue=1;spage=1;epage=3;aulast=Pandya

:: Introduction Top

Dilemma: difficulty, impasse, perplexity, predicament, quandary.
All medical doctors face situations from time to time, where the proper course of action is not clear. We are tempted, then, to paraphase Hamlet: “To do, or not to do – that is the question …”

Take the case of a patient with confirmed malignant cancer of the breast whose chest x-ray film shows a rounded metastatic deposit. She now presents with a history of a recent focal epileptic fit but without any neurological abnormality on examination. Computerised tomographic scan shows what is most probably a metastasis in the left parietal lobe over the motor strip. Are we justified in advising excision of the tumour, knowing that it might leave her hemiplegic and when her general prognosis as regards long-term survival is grim?
Under such circumstances, how do we arrive at a decision? What do we navigate by?

:: Guiding principles Top

Four fundamental ethical principles have received universal acceptance by medical professionals:
* non-maleficence – ‘primum, non nocere’: first of all, do no harm
* beneficence – whatever we do must be for the benefit of the patient;
* respect for autonomy – the patient has an absolute right to make decisions concerning his own well-being, on any test or therapy proposed for him and on measures for resuscitation, prolonged maintenance on a ventilator and other such events.
In order to make such decisions, the patient – and family – need to be adequately informed on the pros and cons of each step. It is the communication of such details, in a manner that is clearly understood, that forms the basis of informed consent.
Justice as with reference to fair distribution of scarce resources; respect for the rights of the patient and family in the context of the rights of society at large; the use of the least expensive means in investigation and therapy; and respect for morally acceptable laws. It also implies the overcoming of personal prejudices – as against homosexuals or chronic alcoholics.
Thoughtful application of these principles to specific instances often helps resolve dilemmas.

:: Some common ethical dilemmas Top

Let us take examples from either end of the spectrum of life.
The treatment of infertility:
In a country where untold numbers of orphaned or discarded infants and children languish in unfeeling institutions where they are denied the attentions of parents and the company of siblings, is it fair for us to embark on such expensive techniques as in vitro fertilization?
On the other hand we have the plea of the barren wife who is willing to sacrifice almost everything to achieve the status of mother.
Possible resolution of dilemma:
Since it is the mother who comes to the doctor seeking treatment and since she has the right to decide on what should be done to and for her, the position of the orphaned children should not be allowed to intrude on the management of her problem.
Abortion:
Those in favour point to the legal sanction afforded to the termination of the life of the unborn foetus. Some have gone so far as to say that this is a welcome means for controlling our mushrooming population. Others have used it to get rid of female foetuses in their quest for the male child.
Many, however, remain troubled. Is this law morally acceptable? Are we ever justified in snuffing out life?
Possible resolution of dilemma:
This will depend on the beliefs and values cherished by the individual doctor. The doctor who holds life, as a sacred boon granted to an individual must refuse to perform or advice an abortion except in the specific instance where continuation of pregnancy may kill the mother. (Here, the operative principle is that the life of the mother is of greater concern than the life of the unborn foetus.)
Must we always strive to keep every baby alive, irrespective of costs?
Take two examples:
A premature newborn weighing 600 grams. Left to itself, it will perish. We can make extraordinary attempts to help it survive. In the process we may lead to a situation where the family is saddled with a severely handicapped individual with poor mental abilities.
A baby is born with meningomyelocele, paraplegia, incontinence of urine and severe hydrocephalus. A light applied to the head shows brilliant transillumination of the intracranial contents suggesting a paper-thin brain. It is possible to repair the skin over the exposed and damaged spinal cord and insert a shunt to drain the accumulated cerebrospinal fluid into the peritoneum. Survival is now assured but the family will bear the burden of looking after a mindless person who unknowingly passes urine and stools reflexly and will never understand, appreciate or communicate.
Possible resolution of dilemma:
The doctor must place the pros and cons of treatment in either instance before the parents. The doctor sympathetic to the social milieu in which the family exists and of the precarious economic circumstances of a particular family will emphasize the liabilities to the parents should treatment be preferred. I have, at times, gone a step further and told the parents that were the child in question mine, I would have decided against treatment.
If it is decided not to treat, should the patient’s life be terminated by a fatal dose of a drug? Some advocate stopping all feeds and supplying only water to take away thirst. The logic offered is that by this means we are not taking away life but allowing nature to take its own course. Is starvation to death not more cruel than instant death?
Possible resolution of dilemma:
Here, as often is the case with ethical dilemmas, the individual doctor’s conscience must dictate the course of action. Such a decision, however, must take into account the fact that the law of the land does not permit any doctor to kill the patient by any act of commission.
Admission to an intensive care unit:
The intensive care unit is already full of seriously ill patients, each of whom needs the special attention afforded in it. A fresh patient is brought to the clinic who also needs this specialized care. There is no other nearby centre that can take him. What is to be done?
Do we continue to treat existing patients and place this patient in a room or ward without special facilities for monitoring and treatment and, in the process, lose this patient? Do we shift the ‘least seriously ill patient’ out of the unit to make way for the new arrival and, in doing so, jeopardize the life of someone who may be on the way to recovery?
What if the new arrival is a ‘V.I.P.’?
A similar dilemma is posed when one has to select which of two patients is to be provided the only available ventilator.
Possible resolution of dilemma:
A new patient presenting to a clinic or hospital has not yet established the doctor-patient relationship with the consultant. Existing patients in the intensive care unit are already under his treatment and he is responsible for their welfare. His primary concern, then, must be for patients already in the unit. If, however, there if definite evidence that one of them can, without any risk, moved out of the intensive care unit
to the half-way house of the semi-intensive care ward, such a transfer can be affected so as to take in the new patient.
Demand for euthanasia by a terminally ill patient in unremitting agony:
A patient with widespread cancer is in severe agony, which persists despite use of the maximal therapeutic doses of powerful drugs such as morphine. He begs to be relieved of pain and asks for the use of much larger doses, knowing that such doses will be fatal. Should one oblige?
Possible resolution of dilemma:
Here, as often is the case with ethical dilemmas, the individual doctor’s conscience must dictate the course of action. Such a decision, however, must take into account the fact that the law of the land does not permit any doctor to kill the patient by any act of commission.
Shutting off the ventilator:
The law, as it stands, does not allow one to take a brain-dead patient off the ventilator unless this patient is a donor of an organ such as the heart. What about the patient who is not suitable to offer an organ but whose relatives can no more afford the cost of an intensive care unit?
Should we insist on following the letter of the law so that we are not subject to prosecution under the Consumer Protection Act or the Indian Penal Code?
Possible resolution of dilemma:
The law, in this instance, is faulty. It is illogical to permit removal of the heart, lungs, kidneys, pancreas and other organs for transplantation into another patient and not allow switching off the ventilator. Senior lawyers consulted by us inform us that judges would, in all probability, rule in favour of the doctor, provided the procedure for the diagnosis of brain death before switching off the ventilator was foolproof.

:: Some personal guidelines Top

I have found the following additional guidelines useful. I pass them on for your consideration.
* The golden rule: Do unto others, as you would have others to do unto you. I have often found it helpful to ask myself, “Were I the patient, what course of action would I have wished the doctor to follow?”
* The patient comes first. The raison d’etre of our profession is the patient. We are here to serve him. The sick patient, often in physical pain and always in mental distress, deserves our fullest attention and calls for the best qualities of our mind and heart. His interests and decisions must prevail above all else except when the patient is non compos mentis. In the latter instance, the decisions of his family must prevail.
* The poor patient deserves special consideration He has nowhere else to go. He does not possess the means to command or demand. In our milieu he is often reduced to seeking help with bowed head and hands folded together. And he is ill. Medically malpractice against this group is particularly abhorrent.
* Ensure that your decisions and actions are scientific, humane, effective and in the best interests of the patient and his family. Record them. Once this is done, you need fear no individual, administrator or tribunal.

Filed Under: Others Tagged With: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

If you can’t find what you looked for, just search

Latest and Recent Events / Notifications

  • AYUSH in Madras Medical College
  • NIMHANS Entrance 2017 Crash Course at Chennai
  • CRASH COURSE NEET 2016 / AIIMS / JIPMER November 2016 @ MADURAI, CHENNAI, NELLAI, COIMBATORE
  • MRB 2014 Counselling Delay. The Way Forward
  • Walk-in Selection for Assistant Surgeons Specialty MRB Tamil Nadu 2014 2015

All Posts Sorted Categorywise

All Posts Sorted Monthwise

Tags

2nd Second Round Counseling 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Admit Card Hall Ticket Exam Centre Allotment Analysis Opinion Answers Ask TargetPG : Doubts Answered Change in Policies Coaching Conferences Seminars Workshops Focus Groups Counseling DME DPH Editorial Entrance FAQ Government Government Order Government Service Judgements Media Coverage Reports MGR Medical University MRB : Medical Services Recruitment Board Notification OHC - Operation Harri Capsule : Crash Course for AIIMS PGI and AIPG Exams Paramedical Pass Fail Pozitive Positive Prospectus Questions Results Theory Written Marks Merit Rank List Rural Service Selection List Service Quota Strategies SuperSpeciality TNPG Notification Uncategorized Vacancy

Footer

Recent Comments

  • luxawish on TN MRB Results 2013 Assistant Surgeon Medical Recruitment Board Tamil Nadu List of 2074 Doctors Selected
  • Berita Pertanian Hari Ini on Health Officers by transfer of service from the post of Assistant Surgeons working in Primary Health Centres
  • Shahid shaikh on About TargetPG : Target Professional Growth / Post Graduation : a helping hand to the hands that heal
  • Dr.Ashwini on TN MRB Results 2013 Assistant Surgeon Medical Recruitment Board Tamil Nadu List of 2074 Doctors Selected
  • bhuvantvmc on TN MRB Results 2013 Assistant Surgeon Medical Recruitment Board Tamil Nadu List of 2074 Doctors Selected

RSS Feeds

Click here to Get Our RSS Feed to read latest events without visiting the site
RSS Subscribers

Follow @TargetPG

Follow @targetpg

Mailing List

Join our Mailing List
Mailing List of TargetPG at Google Groups
Email:
Click to join the Mailing List

Our Facebook Page

Website Design and Maintenance by OSQ Digital

Website Design and Maintenance by OSQ Digital

Copyright © 2002 to 2021 : TargetPG * Target Professional Growth / Post Graduation - a helping hand to the hands that heal * Notifications, Results, Old Question Papers, Answers with references, High Yield Points & Strategies with respect to the Indian Medical Post Graduate PG Entrance Exams like AIIMS,AIPG, JIPMER, CMC Vellore, PGI Chandigarh, UPSC, TNPSC, State PG Exams like Tamil Nadu PG (TN PG), Delhi PG, UPPG, Tamilnadu PG (TNPG), Karnataka PG etc * This is a FREE Portal and is intended for the benefit of PG Aspirants * [email protected] * Call / Whatsapp 9940626911 * Powered by WordPress · Log in